If an installer always proposes an extra, or 2, or 13, then the vendor can claim "I'm just offering this extra that I honestly and sincerely believe the user might be interested in and might benefit from". The special difference is just that it exposes the intent which was theoretically deniable otherwise, even if everyone "just knows" what's really going on. That dynamic reactive 2nd attempt to trick you, which is only invoked if you caught and declined the first, is materially different from the first attempt, and different from if the installer always presented both extras. I think it would be a very weak case and practically impossible to make that argument. It might possibly qualify as an attempt to deceive. ![]() I didn't say it was illegal, just dickish.įraud.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |